1 200 scientists and professionals from across the world led by the Norwegian physics Nobel Prize laureate Professor Ivar Giaever as part of the “Global Climate Intelligence Group” have joined forces and came out with a document titled “There is No Climate Emergency” and declared that truly there is no climate emergency.
Their introductory page which summarises the whole document states:
“There is no climate emergency: Climate science should be less political while climate policies should be more scientific. Scientists should openly address uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of global warming while politicians should dispassionately count the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of their policy measures.
Natural as well as anthropogenic factors cause warming: The geological archive reveals that Earth’s climate has varied as long as the planet has existed with natural cold and warm phases. The Little Ice Age ended as recently as 1850. Therefore it is no surprise that we now are experiencing a period of warming.
Warming is far slower than predicted: The world has warmed significantly less than predicted by IPCC on the basis of modeled anthropogenic forcing. The gap between the real world and the modeled world tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.
Climate policy relies on inadequate models: Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. They do not only exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases they also ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.
CO2 is plant food the basis of all life on Earth: CO2 is not a pollutant.It is essential to all life on Earth. More CO2 is favorable for nature greening our planet. Additional CO2 in the air has promoted growth in global plant biomass. It is also profitable for agriculture increasing the yields of crops worldwide. Global warming has not increased natural disasters. There is no statistical evidence that global warming is intensifying hurricanes floods droughts and suchlike natural disasters or making them more frequent.However there is ample evidence that CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly.
Climate policy must respect scientific and economic realities: There is no climate emergency. Therefore there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. Go for adaptation instead of mitigation; adaptation works whatever the causes are.
OUR ADVICE TO THE EUROPEAN LEADERS IS THAT SCIENCE SHOULD STRIVE FOR A SIGNIFICANTLY BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF THE CLIMATE SYSTEM WHILE POLITICS SHOULD FOCUS ON MINIMIZING POTENTIAL CLIMATE DAMAGE BY PRIORITIZING ADAPTATION STRATEGIES BASED ON PROVEN AND AFFORDABLE TECHNOLOGIES.
To believe the outcome of a climate model is to believe what the model makers have put in. This is precisely the problem of today’s climate discussion to which climate models are central. Climate science has degenerated into a discussion based on beliefs not on sound self-critical science. Should not we free ourselves from the naive belief in immature climate models?”
The document can be read here:
https://clintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/WCD-version-06272215121.pdf
So why aren’t governments and MEPs relying on such a study and document by true professionals and climate scientists but are instead relying on amateurish stupid non-scientific climate models brought forth by taxpayers’ money funded amateurish scientists?