To the question asked in 2021:
“Based on the totality of scientific evidence available do the benefits of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine when administered as a 2-dose series outweigh its risks for use in children 5-11 years of age?”
Dr. Eric Rubin a Harvard professor of immunology who serves as a voting member of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory committee and who is one of 18 members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee replied:
“We’re never gonna learn about how safe the vaccine is until we start giving it.“ “That’s just the way it goes.”
In a nutshell he admitted that it won’t be clear whether vaccinating children against COVID-19 is safe until the shots are widely administered.
In a nutshell he admitted that they would know whether these shots are safe or not once they start witnessing the adverse reactions in vaccinated children.
In a nutshell he admitted that these vaccines are in their experimental phase.
Despite the Harvard immunologist’s troubling admission the panel ultimately voted unanimously — with one abstention — in favour of adding the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination for children to the ongoing emergency use authorization back in 2021.
On the other end of the spectrum Dr. Harvey Risch a Yale epidemiology professor who has appeared on several conservative outlets said on Fox News that he would only recommend vaccination for children who have a chronic illness that makes them more susceptible to severe infection outcomes since most children have no significant problems as a result of a Covid-19 infection. Actually considering what Dr. Rubin stated it should not be given to any child.
Thus he encouraged parents in areas where children may be required to be immunized to remove their children from school and educate them at home.
“If it were my child I would home-school them honestly ” he told host Mark Levin of Fox News. “I would organize with other parents to take them out of the school and create home-schooling environments. There’s no choice. Your child’s life is on the line.”
A kind reminder that even the EMA (European Medicines Agency) authorised the use of such vaccines for children in Europe.
How is it possible that they allow people access to such “approved” vaccines without getting liability protection? And since the Emergency Use Authorisation vaccines have liability in the USA under the Prep Act and the Cares Act as long as you take an emergency use you can’t sue the vaccine makers. Once they get approved you can sue them UNLESS they get it recommended for children.
All vaccines that are officially recommended for children get liability protection even if an adult gets that vaccine.Can a lawyer confirm this and can a lawyer clarify if this is the case in Europe too? Could it be that this is why they are going after the kids even though they know that this is going to kill and injure a huge number of children but they need to do it for the liability protection?
So where is the outrage?