In yet another article, in response to mine, perhaps, Times of Malta gave us the news of a 22-year-old constable Gosef Tanti, who is subletting a house, to sixteen foreign tenants. The house is a three-bedroom property locked in Norfolk Street, Sliema.
Tanti is not the owner of the house but rents it from the owner, John Seychell Navarro, a lawyer and longtime friend of his partner to then sublet to the migrant invaders.
Tanti “claimed he lets out the property to so many tenants to cover high rent and utilities costs.”
“Admitting he knew he was breaking regulations limiting the number of unrelated tenants to six per dwelling, Tanti said he did not think it was wrong, though he conceded it was ‘not fair’.”
Cunningly, TOM uses this case where the one doing the subletting is a policeman and focuses the main story onto him, rather than also putting in the soup mix the true landlord, who is a lawyer! Both are breaking the law and yet both are supposed to uphold the law more than anyone else. As if! The police and the lawyers work under the shoes of government classes and they have become another byproduct of a corporate system of power, economy and corruption.
But if you go through the comments on this article on TOM’s Facebook page, you will immediately realise that TOM managed to funnel the masses to its planned goals, which are:
The first, make them pity the foreign invaders.
The second, make them plead for enforcement – so that the solution will be more totalitarian control.
The third, turn against the police and the landlords.
Yet, we have another article which is not balanced.
TOM did not point out to the fact that although it is surely wrong that the policeman is abusing of tenants, an abuse which I wholly condemn, what about TOM pointing to the fact that this happened with the go-ahead of the same tenants? Surely, the tenants accepted to be 16 in the house. Because in such a way, the rent came cheaper for them individually. TOM stated that they were paying €250 each per month. Very cheap, isn’t it? In fact, in the same article, a former tenant stated that he was attracted to the property by its low rent and ‘no deposit policy.’ What did he expect with such a price and ‘no deposit policy’? Where is the accountability of the tenants? They could have refused the minute they viewed the house and its conditions.
But TOM only blames the policeman. Don’t you dare touch the invaders.
TOM also did not point out to the nationality of these migrants. Instead, it stated, in a nice and sweet way, “The tenants, which Times of Malta understands are mostly foreign workers.” Later on, it cited a former tenant, who goes by the name of Emeka. Emeka is a Nigerian name. Does the nationality make a difference here? Well, since we are tackling migrant invasion, it does. Surely, they weren’t Maltese. Otherwise TOM would not be defending them.
But TOM only defends the invaders. Don’t you dare touch the invaders.
Proof that TOM is defending the migrant invasion can be found in this statement: “Former tenant Emeka, who asked Times of Malta not to publish his surname.” TOM is protecting Emeka’s identity. For what reason did Emeka refrain from giving his surname? Does he have something to hide?
And then it uses the usual trick of psycholinguistics, tapping on the readers’ emotions:
“I did my best to keep the place clean but there were 16 people… I should have been able to come home and relax but I was sad,” said Emeka. Well, this was something he knew when he visited the place and rented it. Even a family of three has to clean daily, let alone 16 people. Even Maltese people should be able to live relaxed in their home country, but they aren’t, because of the migrant invaders.
“Calling the conditions at the property ‘inhumane’, with up to seven people sharing one room, Emeka described feeling powerless at the property, which he recently left: “What was am I going to do? They [Tanti] are Maltese; it’s their country.”
Of course it is our country! It has never belonged to the invaders and will never belong to the invaders! But they pretend that once they are here, our country is theirs. They change our culture. They change our quality of life. They turned us into a bunch of anxious and depressed Mowglis featuring in the new series of ‘The Jungle of Malta.’
Finally, we get to the cockroach part. To make the conditions of the house more appalling, TOM described the house as being cockroach-infested with a video footage showing, in TOM’s words “hundreds of the pests crawling inside kitchen cupboards.” First of all, on watching the video footage, the situation was not that bad as TOM depicted it in the article. The house is surely larger and offers more space than the majority of humble houses that the lower-classes and middle-classes live in. I would have found it more appalling had TOM showed a Maltese living in a garage! I condemn the over-crowding of course and the lack of proper, decent beds.
As for pests, I counted around fifty max, not hundreds! And it looked like a wardrobe, not a kitchen cupboard!
The policeman was right to blame the cockroach infestation on the tenants. Is there a house in Malta which does not get infested with pests, especially in summer, unless you clean and maybe once a year you spray with an appropriate pest-control liquid? The most that the policeman can do is get a pest-control company once a year. But TOM must have picked up on this cockroach part because of the cockroach-infested shaft which I had witnessed and mentioned in one of my articles due to a number of dirty Indians who were living in the block. The Maltese family who lived in the ground-floor maisonette of the block, had told us that the minute the Indians invaded the rest of the block, the shaft became full of big cockroaches.
Times of Malta keeps on defending the migrant invaders.
This country has gone to the dogs. And this is one of the end results of this organized criminal migrant invasion. The victimhood is two-fold and encompasses both the invaders and the Maltese in a vicious, damaging circle. While the migrants are the cheap laboured, they are pushed to afford cheap properties, so their solution is sharing a property. Hence, the abuse of tenants by some landlords. On the other hand, such landlords are the milking suckers of a corrupt system based on an economic model which fuels abuse of migrants and the natives.
Times of Malta is all for the migrant invaders and the multiculturalism agenda. Hence, Times of Malta agrees with the abusive, corrupt economic model of cheap labour which is leading the same multicultural invaders to rent, out of their own accord, cheap property and accommodation, in huge numbers.