It looks like the introduction of mandatory military duty for European under EU leadership is imminent.
After meeting with the EU foreign ministers, Hungarian Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto revealed that that high Ukrainian death toll, coupled with Ukraine’s difficulties in recruiting its own population, means the EU will increasingly move to drafting European youth, especially in Ukraine’s geographical proximity, to fight Russia. These are his exact statements in an interview with Hungarian media:
“Ukrainian losses are becoming more and more unbearable. Ukrainian men are no longer allowed to leave Ukraine, and now they also want to conscript European young people into the war. And since the escalation hits this area first, one can almost clearly hear the argument that the soldiers should be sent from the geographical visit first. All this means that they want to send Central European youth, including Hungarian youth, to war with a European conscription.”
He added that he was against any such moves: “Hands of the Central Europeans, hands off the Hungarian youth, we will not allow the Hungarian youth to be drawn into the war, because this is not the case our war.”
But the construction of an EU military force, with centralization of defense decision-making away from member states, is a long-term objective of the US-aligned elite in Brussels. A proposal like this might make military duty mandatory for all EU members.
Szijjártó spoke of a highly charged environment at the Council of Foreign Ministers in Brussels just before the elections to the European Parliament. The discussion of transferring 6.5 billion euros to Ukraine, which the Hungarian foreign minister rejected on the grounds that it would only intensify the conflict, altered the atmosphere. But a lot of other nations have put tremendous pressure on his position.
He said: ‘And there was a big mess here. The German, Lithuanian, Irish, Polish and other colleagues have opposed me on this issue, but that has not shaken our position, despite the cries of European pro-war politicians’ and added, ‘They think that if they shout from many directions then I will say that it is good, that it is okay. But they should already know us well enough to know that won’t happen.’
It seems that nothing is new under the sun. Though it only goes hand in hand with the planned fiscal union, the concept of military union predates the Second World War and will soon give rise to a “new” entity.
We are facing fiscal-financial (credit)-military antics, all of which are blatantly planned by the Washington, New York, and London planners to guarantee the sacrifice of Europeans on the altar of Anglo-American hegemony.
Comparably little chance exists for “the West” to see sanity prevail.
There is only one question that comes to mind with the turmoil in Georgia and the possibly combustible scenario in the Middle East set to make things much more complicated:
Is the possibility of a number of overlapping disputes getting out of hand the desired result of imposing harsh regulations in light of the approaching financial crisis? Or are these intersecting disputes a sign of a loss of power for globalist elites in Washington, New York, and London?
Is the EU drafting our children for the hegemony of the Totalitarian Technocratic Transhumanist Tyrants (aka the Globalist Elites) as what’s being proposed by the European dictocrates?
Who is doing the wagging here? Is it the dog or the tail?