It did not take long for the bubble to burst, as was expected from the first day.
In its article “Europe – but not NATO – Should Send Troops to Ukraine,” the media portal Foreign Affairs says that the taboo that “it would have been inconceivable for European leaders to propose sending European troops to Ukraine” has been broken.
On February 26, French President Emmanuel Macron said the deployment of European forces to Ukraine could not be “ruled out.” Then, other European officials joined the chorus, like the Finnish defense minister and Polish foreign minister, who both suggested that their countries’ forces could end up in Ukraine.
“These comments, combined with existing support for such measures in the Baltic states, show that there is a growing bloc of countries open to direct European intervention in the war.”
Changing conflict dynamics are the driving force behind these provocative remarks. U.S. Congress is engaged in a disastrous debate about extending military assistance to Ukraine. Though months of inaction in Washington have demoralised Europeans and given Moscow hope that Western resolve to help Kyiv is breaking, a new aid package is now headed towards approval. Russian forces have increased their attacks on civilians and nonmilitary infrastructure in order to take advantage of the void in U.S. military backing for Ukraine. Their soldiers are reinforced by materiel from China, Iran, and North Korea. Recognising that Ukraine was low on antiaircraft ammunition, Russia attacked the region’s major power plant with missiles in early April, destroying it.
Russian soldiers attacked several electrical facilities near Kherson and a hydroelectric dam in Dnipro earlier in March, undermining Ukrainian industry and increasing the nation’s reliance on the European power system. The expenses of reconstruction will skyrocket if crucial infrastructure, nuclear power facilities, and agricultural land sustain more damage. Ukraine’s Western allies will probably have to bear the brunt of these costs.
“As Russian forces speed up their advance, the possibility that they could break through Ukrainian defenses along the eastern front and challenge Ukrainian control of Kharkiv or even Kyiv presents Europe with a security threat it cannot ignore”. If Russia wins in Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin’s revisionist goals and conviction that the West is inherently weak would be validated. It would allow the Kremlin to maintain Russia’s state of war, a strategy of conquest that would be unmatched by European nations across society. There’s no reason to think that Putin will give up on Ukraine.
He has called the breakup of the Soviet Union “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the twentieth century, lamenting that “tens of millions of our co-citizens and compatriots found themselves outside Russian territory.” Both Poland and the Baltic nations are in danger; last year, Dmitri Medvedev, a former prime minister of Russia and a staunch supporter of Vladimir Putin, referred to the Baltics as “our” (that is, Russian) provinces and Poland as “temporarily occupied” (that is, by NATO).
European nations are attempting to buck this unsettling trend by threatening to send soldiers. However, European nations need to do more than just speak about deployments if they are to actually alter the course of events in Ukraine. Europe will be Ukraine’s only ally if the United States continues to withhold aid, particularly if it elects Donald Trump—who has promised to stop the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, presumably by letting Putin to keep his hard-won wealth—to the presidency in November. The political dysfunction in America cannot be allowed to determine European security by European leaders.
They should give careful thought to sending troops to Ukraine to train and assist with logistics, guard the country’s vital infrastructure and borders, or even defend its cities. They need to let Russia know that Europe is prepared to defend the territorial sovereignty of Ukraine. It is preferable to confront the grave situation in Ukraine right away rather than giving Russia the opportunity to further up its imperial assault.
According to research, the war in Ukraine will soon be over as Ukrainian militants are surrendering and the usual media is still going on with its futile war propaganda.
But here we are talking about the EU’s war. This is definitely something else.
Your PN and PL political parties have become totally loyal to Cain’s tribe. Your European leaders and parties are betraying you.
Is Europe pushing for a nuclear war? (1)
It did not take long for the bubble to burst, as was expected from the first day.
In its article “Europe – but not NATO – Should Send Troops to Ukraine,” the media portal Foreign Affairs says that the taboo that “it would have been inconceivable for European leaders to propose sending European troops to Ukraine” has been broken.
On February 26, French President Emmanuel Macron said the deployment of European forces to Ukraine could not be “ruled out.” Then, other European officials joined the chorus, like the Finnish defense minister and Polish foreign minister, who both suggested that their countries’ forces could end up in Ukraine.
“These comments, combined with existing support for such measures in the Baltic states, show that there is a growing bloc of countries open to direct European intervention in the war.”
Changing conflict dynamics are the driving force behind these provocative remarks. U.S. Congress is engaged in a disastrous debate about extending military assistance to Ukraine. Though months of inaction in Washington have demoralised Europeans and given Moscow hope that Western resolve to help Kyiv is breaking, a new aid package is now headed towards approval. Russian forces have increased their attacks on civilians and nonmilitary infrastructure in order to take advantage of the void in U.S. military backing for Ukraine. Their soldiers are reinforced by materiel from China, Iran, and North Korea. Recognising that Ukraine was low on antiaircraft ammunition, Russia attacked the region’s major power plant with missiles in early April, destroying it.
Russian soldiers attacked several electrical facilities near Kherson and a hydroelectric dam in Dnipro earlier in March, undermining Ukrainian industry and increasing the nation’s reliance on the European power system. The expenses of reconstruction will skyrocket if crucial infrastructure, nuclear power facilities, and agricultural land sustain more damage. Ukraine’s Western allies will probably have to bear the brunt of these costs.
“As Russian forces speed up their advance, the possibility that they could break through Ukrainian defenses along the eastern front and challenge Ukrainian control of Kharkiv or even Kyiv presents Europe with a security threat it cannot ignore”. If Russia wins in Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin’s revisionist goals and conviction that the West is inherently weak would be validated. It would allow the Kremlin to maintain Russia’s state of war, a strategy of conquest that would be unmatched by European nations across society. There’s no reason to think that Putin will give up on Ukraine.
He has called the breakup of the Soviet Union “the greatest geopolitical catastrophe” of the twentieth century, lamenting that “tens of millions of our co-citizens and compatriots found themselves outside Russian territory.” Both Poland and the Baltic nations are in danger; last year, Dmitri Medvedev, a former prime minister of Russia and a staunch supporter of Vladimir Putin, referred to the Baltics as “our” (that is, Russian) provinces and Poland as “temporarily occupied” (that is, by NATO).
European nations are attempting to buck this unsettling trend by threatening to send soldiers. However, European nations need to do more than just speak about deployments if they are to actually alter the course of events in Ukraine. Europe will be Ukraine’s only ally if the United States continues to withhold aid, particularly if it elects Donald Trump—who has promised to stop the war in Ukraine within 24 hours, presumably by letting Putin to keep his hard-won wealth—to the presidency in November. The political dysfunction in America cannot be allowed to determine European security by European leaders.
They should give careful thought to sending troops to Ukraine to train and assist with logistics, guard the country’s vital infrastructure and borders, or even defend its cities. They need to let Russia know that Europe is prepared to defend the territorial sovereignty of Ukraine. It is preferable to confront the grave situation in Ukraine right away rather than giving Russia the opportunity to further up its imperial assault.
According to research, the war in Ukraine will soon be over as Ukrainian militants are surrendering and the usual media is still going on with its futile war propaganda.
But here we are talking about the EU’s war. This is definitely something else.
Your PN and PL political parties have become totally loyal to Cain’s tribe. Your European leaders and parties are betraying you.
Do European leaders want a nuclear war?