“This one is a very interesting one. It comes from low intensity conflict in modern technology. This is Captain Tyler. He’s dead now. Thank God he’s gone because this guy interfered with more good science than anyone on the planet in this particular area. But he looked at all these esoteric things that weren’t well documented.
The guy who wrote the foreword for this book, it came out of Maxwell Air Force base, was Newt Gingrich who was really excited about all this cool technology from his perspective. But this particular chapter deals with sort of the anomalous side of the technology and in particular he gets into what he calls ‘anomalous human capabilities,’ what we used to call extra-sensory perceptions. You know, the six senses. And the idea of manipulating that in such a way as to be advantageous.
In fact, at our minds effects conference, a closed conference, the thing that startled me the most is that everyone in that room felt that the next evolution of humankind was the awakening of that sixth sense in all of us. And I believe that was the thing that the military discovered – that we all have this innate God-given creator, however you want to look at that ability that our belief systems inhibit a lot of other things inhibit.
But consider transparent government if we all had that capability. I mean it will be judgement day, right? I mean every judgement will be weighed on a fundamental level because if we’re totally transparent it shows every other human being. We have to be pretty forgiving human beings. And maybe that’s our highest human attribute after all. You know we saw that truth is worth something. Truth is worth finding out. There needs to be a whistleblower mechanism for the private sector and the public sector that actually work. There needs to be real truth commissions like what happened in South Africa. Look at what happened there. People had an opportunity to come forward, tell the truth, be forgiven or else be prosecuted severely if they did. We need that in Western Europe. We need that in the U.S. An opportunity for people of conscience to step forward, acknowledge our mistakes, clear the slate and start again on some of the things that could advance humankind rather than suppress it.
Because these technologies are about suppressing it. The military is not known for any high human affairs except killing each other. It’s the wrong group to be controlling science. Think about science today. How many people in our legislatures around the world or our parliaments have any scientific background at all? And yet what makes governments the most powerful in the 21st century? The command and control of high science which means if we’re going to operate within democratic republics and democracies as citizens, we have to have a certain level of knowledge.
Now, it doesn’t mean that we have to know how to build all this stuff any more than most of us can even repair an automobile today. Something we used to be able to do. But we can still drive it from place to place. Conceptually, we need open debate on weapons’ concepts so we as citizens can direct our governments on the way in which they should go.
And we have the opposite. We have a military academic complex and an uninformed, in our country, an uninformed congress that on the most classified of research, only the congressional leaders can be present. They can’t discuss it with anyone. They can’t bring experts in to refute what they’re being fed. And they don’t have the background knowledge, even approach it. I mean we got a couple of doctors, a couple of MDs, a few people out of 535 that have any science background at all within our congress. That is a huge, huge hole in a modern society, the one that we built around us that depends on technology for our very existence, and drive so much of where we’re at. That’s why we’re in the mess we’re in right now quite frankly, because policy is not keeping up. Technology used to double every five years. This is back in the 1980s. That’s from the invention of the wheel to where we are at. Today, it’s about every eight or nine months where technology doubles. We can’t keep up with the regulation. We have to look forward, looking at the base of knowledge that we have now, look forward and begin to regulate the technologies that are actually dominating our lives today. If we’ve been doing that for the last twenty years, if we’ve been exercising at least what they attempt to do here in Europe as a precautionary principle and environmental and health issues, you sort of anticipate and let the world know ‘hey there may be this problem so at least we have a decision point to make that each of us can make in deciding how to push policies forward.”