With the kind of multiculturalism which is being imposed on the Maltese nation and the Europeans, a cold genocide of white people, Christians and indigenous people, can we say that the government is violating our rights as indigenous people of Malta and of Europe?
What is the definition of ‘genocide’ according to the UN? Firstly, it means the killing of members of a group; secondly, it means to cause serious physical or mental harm to group members; thirdly, to deliberately inflict on a group, conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; fourthly, the imposition of measures intended to prevent births within the group; and lastly, forcible direct or indirect transfer of the children of the group to another group.
Let’s have a look at the laws that are implemented and protect other races around the world in their homeland, except, apparently, the Europeans, who include us the Maltese people.
The first is the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (61/295), a resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13th September 2007 which is constitued of forty-six articles which may be read in the document and which, in a nutshell, “establishes a universal framework of minimum standards for the survival, dignity, wellbeing and rights of the world’s indigenous peoples” while addressing both individual and collective rights; cultural rights and identity; rights to education, health, employment, language, and others.” It establishes the right to self-determination of indigenous nations and their right to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, culture, and traditions, including the right to their ancestral lands, territories, and resources. Of specific importance are Article 8, Article 10 and Article 25.
Article 8 specifies the right for indigenous people not to be subject to forced assimilation or the destruction of their culture. Article 10 specifies the right for indigenous people to maintain and control their cultural heritage and traditional knowledge and Article 25 specifies the right for indigenous people to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their homeland and the land of their folklore, their waters, and their resources.
The second is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) which recognise the Rights of the Indigenous Peope to Self-determination which includes a number of economic, social, and cultural rights that also stress the rights to an adequate standard of living, the right to education, and the right to participate in cultural life.
The third is the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimation which states that indigenous people are protected against discrimination and that the state is obliged to ensure protection of the rights of indigenous people and measures must be taken to ensure that their rights are protected.
The fourth is the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which prohibits acts carried out with the intention of destroying, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This also includes violence by both direct and indirect means, with an attack against the natives or their territories, as well as another form of cultural or physical destruction.
The fifth is the Convention of the International Labour Organization Nr. 169 whose Article 7 states that “the State must ensure that the indigenous people are not removed from their homeland or form their land without their free consent and without prior informative discussions. Therefore, they must be protected from acts of violence, hostility, or discrimination” while Article 13 states that “the State must protect the security and integrity of the rights of the indigenous people towards their homeland, their hearth land, their resources, their Cultural identity, and the participation in the decision making. This obligates states to consult with the indigenous people before carrying out any project or activity that may affect them.”
The sixth is the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) which holds jurisdiction over crimes against humanity, including acts committed against indigenous peoples. This includes forced displacement, torture, rape, or any form of violence, both directly and indirectly intended to suppress or destroy a particular group, including during armed conflicts against the indigenous people.
The seventh is the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) whose Article 8J recognises the security and importance of traditional knowledge and innovations held by indigenous people in the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and therefore, requires that indigenous and local communities should be respected, preserved, and maintained.
The eighth is the Nagoya protocol on access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the benefits arising from their Use for the Convention on Biological Diversity which is a ‘continuation’ of the CBD which is a protocol establishes a framework for the fair and equitable sharing of benefits resulting from use of genetic resources and requires states to consult with indigenous people before carrying out any activity related to the use of any genetic resources and which also recognises the importance of traditional knowledge held by indigenous people in the conservation and the sustainable use of biological resources.
The ninth is the Convention on the Rights of the Child which obligates the states to protect indigenous children from discrimination and to have access to culturally appropriate education and health care services.
In this historical, unique time where the greatest crimes against humanity are being committed, where the puppets and the puppeteers are in cahoots and in joint forces against humanity, how come is the UN, the modern Babylon, silent about the breaching of the above laws?
Why isn’t anyone investigating these serious breaches?
Dear government, can you explain to the Maltese nation which you should be serving, why are all the above laws being breached when it comes to the illegal migration and the kind of multiculturalism being imposed on us, indigenous people of Malta? We did not vote for this. We did not ask for this. We do not want this.
Dear government, can you explain to the Maltese nation why have you turned into a puppet of this kind of agenda and you have turned useless, without any say as to how you should protect the Maltese nation? Dear government, if you cannot disobey the puppeteers, then see to it, wisely! Or were such agendas fomented long time ago, under the helm of the PN, possibly under Eddie Fenech Adami, and now you find yourself without any say about them?
Dear government, there will come a time when the Maltese nation will become a time-bomb. Maybe it already is. And when this time-bomb explodes, you will have to explain why did you allow these laws to be broken and stepped upon – laws which should have defended the Maltese natives, which you claim to be serving.
Is the government breaching the law when it comes to illegal immigration and the kind of multiculturalism which is being imposed on us natives, in our country by right and birth?
With the kind of multiculturalism which is being imposed on the Maltese nation and the Europeans, a cold genocide of white people, Christians and indigenous people, can we say that the government is violating our rights as indigenous people of Malta and of Europe?
What is the definition of ‘genocide’ according to the UN? Firstly, it means the killing of members of a group; secondly, it means to cause serious physical or mental harm to group members; thirdly, to deliberately inflict on a group, conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; fourthly, the imposition of measures intended to prevent births within the group; and lastly, forcible direct or indirect transfer of the children of the group to another group.
Let’s have a look at the laws that are implemented and protect other races around the world in their homeland, except, apparently, the Europeans, who include us the Maltese people.
The first is the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People (61/295), a resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 13th September 2007 which is constitued of forty-six articles which may be read in the document and which, in a nutshell, “establishes a universal framework of minimum standards for the survival, dignity, wellbeing and rights of the world’s indigenous peoples” while addressing both individual and collective rights; cultural rights and identity; rights to education, health, employment, language, and others.” It establishes the right to self-determination of indigenous nations and their right to maintain and strengthen their own institutions, culture, and traditions, including the right to their ancestral lands, territories, and resources. Of specific importance are Article 8, Article 10 and Article 25.
Article 8 specifies the right for indigenous people not to be subject to forced assimilation or the destruction of their culture. Article 10 specifies the right for indigenous people to maintain and control their cultural heritage and traditional knowledge and Article 25 specifies the right for indigenous people to maintain and strengthen their distinctive spiritual relationship with their homeland and the land of their folklore, their waters, and their resources.
The second is the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) which recognise the Rights of the Indigenous Peope to Self-determination which includes a number of economic, social, and cultural rights that also stress the rights to an adequate standard of living, the right to education, and the right to participate in cultural life.
The third is the Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial Discrimation which states that indigenous people are protected against discrimination and that the state is obliged to ensure protection of the rights of indigenous people and measures must be taken to ensure that their rights are protected.
The fourth is the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide which prohibits acts carried out with the intention of destroying, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group. This also includes violence by both direct and indirect means, with an attack against the natives or their territories, as well as another form of cultural or physical destruction.
The fifth is the Convention of the International Labour Organization Nr. 169 whose Article 7 states that “the State must ensure that the indigenous people are not removed from their homeland or form their land without their free consent and without prior informative discussions. Therefore, they must be protected from acts of violence, hostility, or discrimination” while Article 13 states that “the State must protect the security and integrity of the rights of the indigenous people towards their homeland, their hearth land, their resources, their Cultural identity, and the participation in the decision making. This obligates states to consult with the indigenous people before carrying out any project or activity that may affect them.”
The sixth is the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (ICC) which holds jurisdiction over crimes against humanity, including acts committed against indigenous peoples. This includes forced displacement, torture, rape, or any form of violence, both directly and indirectly intended to suppress or destroy a particular group, including during armed conflicts against the indigenous people.
The seventh is the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) whose Article 8J recognises the security and importance of traditional knowledge and innovations held by indigenous people in the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity, and therefore, requires that indigenous and local communities should be respected, preserved, and maintained.
The eighth is the Nagoya protocol on access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the benefits arising from their Use for the Convention on Biological Diversity which is a ‘continuation’ of the CBD which is a protocol establishes a framework for the fair and equitable sharing of benefits resulting from use of genetic resources and requires states to consult with indigenous people before carrying out any activity related to the use of any genetic resources and which also recognises the importance of traditional knowledge held by indigenous people in the conservation and the sustainable use of biological resources.
The ninth is the Convention on the Rights of the Child which obligates the states to protect indigenous children from discrimination and to have access to culturally appropriate education and health care services.
In this historical, unique time where the greatest crimes against humanity are being committed, where the puppets and the puppeteers are in cahoots and in joint forces against humanity, how come is the UN, the modern Babylon, silent about the breaching of the above laws?
Why isn’t anyone investigating these serious breaches?
Dear government, can you explain to the Maltese nation which you should be serving, why are all the above laws being breached when it comes to the illegal migration and the kind of multiculturalism being imposed on us, indigenous people of Malta? We did not vote for this. We did not ask for this. We do not want this.
Dear government, can you explain to the Maltese nation why have you turned into a puppet of this kind of agenda and you have turned useless, without any say as to how you should protect the Maltese nation? Dear government, if you cannot disobey the puppeteers, then see to it, wisely! Or were such agendas fomented long time ago, under the helm of the PN, possibly under Eddie Fenech Adami, and now you find yourself without any say about them?
Dear government, there will come a time when the Maltese nation will become a time-bomb. Maybe it already is. And when this time-bomb explodes, you will have to explain why did you allow these laws to be broken and stepped upon – laws which should have defended the Maltese natives, which you claim to be serving.